Showing posts with label pro-Hillary merchandise. Show all posts
Showing posts with label pro-Hillary merchandise. Show all posts

Monday, August 01, 2011

Don't blame me! I voted for Hillary

Don't blame me! I voted for Hillary merchandise at SmartAssProducts.com As disgust with the grossly unqualified, incompetent Obama continues to grow, we're getting more and more hits from people looking for "Don't blame me! I voted for Hillary" merchandise. Although it sucks that we're stuck with Obama--for now--my conscience is clear knowing that I did not support him and that I KNEW Hillary Clinton was the better choice. It's still surprising to me, a lifelong Democrat, that I ended up voting Republican in the Presidential election, but I simply could not, with a clear conscience, vote for Barack Hussein Obama, so my vote went to McCain. Hopefully, the 2012 elections will see a QUALIFIED Democrat on the ticket that I'll feel good voting for. Stay tuned...

Meanwhile, if you're looking for "Don't blame me! I voted for Hillary" merchandise, please stop by our CafePress shop. Here are a few samples; select any image to see all products with this design on them:


Don't blame me! I voted for Hillary merchandise at SmartAssProducts.com Don't blame me! I voted for Hillary merchandise at SmartAssProducts.com Don't blame me! I voted for Hillary merchandise at SmartAssProducts.com Don't blame me! I voted for Hillary merchandise at SmartAssProducts.com Don't blame me! I voted for Hillary merchandise at SmartAssProducts.com Don't blame me! I voted for Hillary merchandise at SmartAssProducts.com


.

Saturday, March 01, 2008

It's like being in school again

After several of the Democratic debates, I was left with a familiar, yet hard to finger, feeling--but today it hit me! Have you noticed how the moderators (and I use the term loosely, since they're all VERY obviously using different standards for Clinton and Obama) are asking Clinton the tough questions FIRST, and then letting Mr "All Hype, No Substance" Obama answer LAST? Why are they doing that? Well, that's what hit me today. By choosing Clinton to respond first, they're letting her do all the hard work--like the smarter girl in class--and then letting Obama basically echo whatever she said--like the not-as-smart boy in class. This is like being back in school...elementary school.

Looking for anti-Obama or pro-Hillary merchandise?

It's remarkable that such blatant sexism can rear its ugly little head in such an important arena as a presidential debate, but it's definitely there. Over and over again. (As I was typing this, Saturday Night Live came on and the opening skit was a parody of the most recent debate--and they nailed it! They nailed exactly what I was thinking, i.e., that Clinton gets the tough questions while Obama gets praised as if he's God for saying the most basic things. Unbelievable.)

At some point before this presidential contest ends, I'd REALLY like to see some equity in the treatment of the candidates by the media. I've never seen anything as outrageous as the disparity in treatment that Clinton and Obama are receiving--and if Clinton even dares point anything out, no matter how accurate her observations may be, she gets blasted for whining. If the shoe was on the other foot, and Obama was being treated EXTREMELY unfairly in the press and had the balls to point it out, he'd probably be praised for standing up for himself. There it is again, the sexist double standard. When a woman stands up for herself she's whining and/or she's a bitch, but when a man does it, he's just doing what he needs to do. This really sucks...

Tuesday, February 12, 2008

Media bias, sexism, racism...

Apparently, Gov. Ed Rendell of Pennsylvania made the following comment last week while meeting with the editorial board of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette to talk about his latest budget: "You've got conservative whites here, and I think there are some whites who are probably not ready to vote for an African-American candidate." So, what happens as a result? Well, because Rendell is a Clinton supporter, one thing that happened is the media reported it as coming from a "Clinton ally"--which practically implies that Clinton herself said it or that she shares Rendell's feelings. And thanks to the blatant, ridiculous media bias in Obama's favor, naturally this is getting a lot of attention.

But you know what else it did? It made clear to people like myself--who grew up in the heyday of the feminist movement--that sexism is alive and well in the USA. You may not immediately see where I'm going with this, but--trust me!--it makes sense.

Looking for anti-Obama merchandise?

By raising the racism issue in regards to Obama--or, as I prefer to call him, ODrama--his bandwagoneers will undoubtedly get riled up and come out in droves in Pennsylvania to support him, and there will equally undoubtedly be an uproar among black leaders, in black churches, black communities, etc. But what if Rendell, or some other public figure, changed the wording just slightly? What if someone said this: "You've got conservative males here, and I think there are some males--and females--who are probably not ready to vote for a female candidate."? Would there be an equal uproar? I doubt it.

As someone on a pro-Hillary site I frequent said, "Sexism is the last acceptable prejudice..." If a woman ran for president with the identical record [and I'm using that term loosely!] Obama has, and ran against a man with Clinton's qualifications, said woman wouldn't stand a CHANCE of being nominated. There would be no unwarranted mania surrounding her--as there is with Obama. In fact, she would most likely be laughed out of the race! Can you imagine a FEMALE one-term senator, wholly lacking any other experience that made her qualified to be president, having the audacity to run? I can only imagine the hysterical laughter that would ensue from bigots and conservatives, such as Rush Limbaugh, at the very idea.

Why, then, is Obama being treated like God's gift to humanity? The man has done NOTHING to warrant the cult-like devotion we're now seeing across the country, and if a woman with his same record dared to run for president, it'd be all over but the laughing long before the election.

If, heaven forbid, ODrama actually wins the general election, be prepared for 4 more years of mayhem and economic woes. Once he's confronted with the realities of trying to clean up after 8 Bush years, and he finds out that merely saying "present"--or, better yet!, pressing the WRONG BUTTON, just won't cut it, what are we supposed to do?

Sunday, February 10, 2008

I may be voting Republican this year!

Yeah, well, I've done it before and fully expected to do it again at some point: I may vote Republican this November. The more I hear and see of Obama and the ridiculous, unjustified worship he's receiving, the more I can't stand him. I've long admired John McCain because--unlike the cowardly deserter CURRENTLY in the White House--he's a real veteran...not just a veteran, but a true war hero. I know that he's a decent man, and he has plenty of experience in politics. If it comes down to choosing between ODrama and McCain, I do believe I'll be casting my vote for McCain.

Looking for anti-Obama merchandise?

Of course, I'm less than thrilled with McCain's recent "100 years" remark about Iraq, and I will have to weigh that and some of his other beliefs before really deciding whether to vote for him. But right now, I simply can't stomach the idea of voting for Obama...

Saturday, February 09, 2008

I can't wait for my new stuff to arrive!

I already have A LOT of stuff from my web site, but I just ordered some more last night and can't wait for the package to arrive. The next time I go to a Hillary rally/meeting/whatever, I'll be wearing this shirt, which I already have:



adorned with these buttons:






and I'll ride there with these bumper stickers showing:



and my all-time personal favorite:

Blog Archive