Don't blame me! I voted for Hillary

As disgust with the grossly unqualified, incompetent Obama continues to grow, we're getting more and more hits from people looking for "Don't blame me! I voted for Hillary" merchandise. Although it sucks that we're stuck with Obama--for now--my conscience is clear knowing that I did not support him and that I KNEW Hillary Clinton was the better choice. It's still surprising to me, a lifelong Democrat, that I ended up voting Republican in the Presidential election, but I simply could not, with a clear conscience, vote for Barack Hussein Obama, so my vote went to McCain. Hopefully, the 2012 elections will see a QUALIFIED Democrat on the ticket that I'll feel good voting for. Stay tuned...

Meanwhile, if you're looking for "Don't blame me! I voted for Hillary" merchandise, please stop by our CafePress shop. Here are a few samples; select any image to see all products with this design on them:





.

Unity? Yeah, I don't think so...

There's a LOT of movement going on right now in the anti-Obama/anti-DNC world. In fact, there's so much happening that it's gotten quite difficult to keep up with it all! So I thought I'd take a stab at putting some links together in one place that people can go to in order to stay up on what's happening. Note that many of these links contain lists of other links...so once you start visiting these, you can easily connect with tons of other pro-Hillary/anti-Obama sites.

JustSayNoDeal.com -- We are a coalition of millions with one thing in common: NObama

HillaryGreenMountain.org -- A great place for news and info about all things pro-Hillary

ClintonDems.com -- The goal of this website is to create a place where Democrats that feel the DNC and media have acted in bad faith towards the American people can gather to organize, share insights and have their voices be heard. The Superdelegates are watching...make sure they hear you too!

Hillary-Clintons-Voice.com -- Hillary Clinton has been actively fighting in the political arena for decades. I refer to it as an arena, because she has had to endure brutal media bias and outright attacks from others. Somehow, the media believes that everything in her life, including the most intimate details, should be fully disclosed to the entire nation. But, that same media does not apply these rules to her adversaries.

18 Million Voices -- We have recently changed our name from "Million Women March Rise Hillary Rise" to "18 Million Voices Rise Hillary Rise" in response to feedback asking us to adopt a more inclusive name. Our goals and organizing efforts haven't changed, and we are gaining more momentum each and every day.

Pro-Hillary Network -- nice list put together by HillaryClintonForum.net, an Obamabot-free zone

Leaving the Democratic Party -- Many of us have left, or are leaving, the [un]Democratic party, and this is a good place to go for support and validation of that decision

NObama Blog -- I think its title is self-explanatory!

Democrats-Against-Obama.org -- Another self-explanatory title

Hillary Blogosphere -- A pretty comprehensive list of pro-Hillary/anti-Obama blogs

Well, I hope that gives you something to start with as you make your way around cyberspace looking for places that recognize Obama for the farce he is--and Clinton for the far superior choice for president that she is.

.

Yet another reason Clinton is better than Obama: Humane Society ratings

As if all the good things Hillary Clinton has done--and all the really bad things/people/places/associations Obama has--weren't enough, here's yet another reason Clinton is so vastly superior to that smug idiot. According to the Humane Society's scorecard on animal protection, Clinton scores a perfect 100%, while Obama rates a paltry 60%. Am *I* surprised? No.

Looking for anti-Obama merchandise? Shop our anti-Obama and/or pro-Hillary merchandise
Anyone who supports the fur industry with its appalling treatment of animals, as the Obamas do, must be scumbags anyway, so I really wouldn't expect much from him/them when it comes to animal-related concerns.

Here are the Humane Society's explanations for their ratings:

Hillary Clinton Scored 100% on Humane Society Scorecard on animal protection

The Humane Society 109th Congress Scorecard on animal protection scored Clinton 100+ out of 100, based on:

• Clinton co-sponsored the Horse Slaughter Prevention Act (S.1915): To bar slaughtering horses for human consumption. Bill had 34 co-sponsors.
  
  
• Clinton voted for the Horse Slaughter Amendment (9/20/2005): to stop export of horses for slaughter.
  
  
• Clinton co-sponsored the Animal Fighting Prohibition Act (S.382): To criminalize dogfighting & cockfighting. The bill had 51 cosponsors & passed unanimously on 4/28/2005.
  
  
• Clinton co-sponsored the Downed Animal Protection Act (S.1779): to ban "downed" (unable to walk to slaughter) cattle, pigs & sheep in human food. Bill had 26 cosponsors.
  
  
• Clinton signed the Funding Letter to the Agriculture Appropriations Subcommittee: seeking funds for the Animal Welfare Act, Humane Methods of Slaughter Act, & federal animal fighting law. The letter was cosigned by 44 senators & sent on 5/25/2006.
  
  
• Clinton took leadership on animal protection.
  

Source: Humane Society 109th Congress Scorecard, www.fund.org Jan 31, 2007


Barack Hussein Obama Scored 60% on Humane Society Scorecard on animal protection

The Humane Society 109th Congress Scorecard on animal protection issues scored Obama 60 out of 100, based on:

• Obama did not co-sponsor the Horse Slaughter Prevention Act (S.1915): To bar slaughtering horses for human consumption. Bill had 34 co-sponsors.
  
  
• Obama voted for the Horse Slaughter Amendment (9/20/2005): to stop export of horses for slaughter.
  
  
• Obama co-sponsored the Animal Fighting Prohibition Act (S.382): To criminalize dogfighting & cockfighting. The bill had 51 cosponsors & passed unanimously on 4/28/2005.
  
  
• Obama did not co-sponsor the Downed Animal Protection Act (S.1779): to ban "downed" (unable to walk to slaughter) cattle, pigs & sheep in human food. Bill had 26 cosponsors.
  
  
• Obama signed the Funding Letter to the Agriculture Appropriations Subcommittee: seeking funds for the Animal Welfare Act, Humane Methods of Slaughter Act, & federal animal fighting law. The letter was cosigned by 44 senators & sent on 5/25/2006.
  

Source: Humane Society 109th Congress Scorecard, www.fund.org Jan 31, 2007

In addition to the above, Senator Clinton has also supported many other animal-oriented issues, including:

• Sponsoring legislation to crack down on puppy mills.
  
  
• Requesting more funds for the USDA to step up enforcement of the Animal Welfare Act, Humane Methods of Slaughter Act, and federal animal fighting law.
  
  
• Taking a leadership role in efforts to stop the overuse of antibiotics in farm animals.
  
  
• Supporting the Farm Animal Stewardship Purchasing Act.
  

and much more.

So if you're concerned about animals, know your candidates! You can give your vote to the heartless scumbag fur-supporting Obama who rates a miserable 60% or to the animal-friendly Clinton who rates 100%. Easy choice, in my opinion.

Sexism in 2008

The rampant sexism in the current presidential campaign has served as a reminder of just how prevalent sexism still is in the United States, even in 2008. It's not just that Hillary Clinton has been treated like dirt by the media, Howard Dean, the DNC, and a plethora of traitors who chose to jump on the bandwagon of a grossly unqualified, highly suspect male competitor. It's not just that Clinton is being treated like so many other smart, driven women have been throughout history, i.e., looked at as a "bitch"--whereas a similarly driven man would be seen as motivated--and expected to play second fiddle to a male. No, all of that just acts as a reminder that sexism is so prevalent in our society that even today--when women are doctors, lawyers, judges, police officers, astronauts, Supreme Court justices, and so much more--we're still basically second-class citizens.

Don't believe me? Turn on your TV. Watch commercials for products like Pledge, Oust, Flintstones vitamins, Clorox, Lysol, and many others. What's the common theme? It's always mom who does the housework. It's always mom who talks about cleaning products and who's shown taking care of her home and family. It's always mom who knows just how many paper towels a spill needs, or who cleans up after the other people in the family. It's always "Moms know how important..." or "...the one moms choose..." or "we asked these real moms..." or "mom-tested recipes..." Um, where's dad?

Does being born with testicles make men less able to wash dishes or do laundry--correctly? Or is it that being born with ovaries somehow gives women magical powers--within the four walls of their houses only?

I am so sick of seeing ads that make it seem like it's the 1950s instead of 2008. Apparently, the powers that be at certain companies still haven't heard that women have been unchained from the kitchen now for several decades, and that women actually can and do have productive careers other than cooking and cleaning inside their homes. They're apparently unaware that men care about their kids, too, and that men shop, cook, do laundry, wash dishes and vacuum--all without their wives showing them the "right" way to do it [since men are inept morons when it comes to housework]. Yes!, men actually do these things just as competently as women. Yet, for some reason, advertisers still don't get it.

When I contact a company, as I did Lysol most recently, to complain, I typically get a reply that says something along the lines of, "We truly regret that you were dissatisfied with this commercial. Please feel assured that your comments have been passed on to our Brand Manager for consideration in future advertising." But nothing changes. And I really don't get it. Why the insistence on advertising as if we're back in Leave It To Beaver or Father Knows Best days is beyond me. Why alienate women--AND men--who don't recognize themselves in these commercials with outdated gender stereotypes? Shouldn't advertisers pay attention to the realities of modern day life, instead of trying--HARD--to make it look as if women are nothing more than "housewives" with magical powers that only extend to cooking, cleaning, and doing laundry?

On a related note, how about the still-prevalent use of "Miss" and "Mrs" as salutations for women? Sorry, but "Miss" and "Mrs" are archaic, sexist, and outdated; "Ms" is nonsexist and should be used instead.

Think of it like this: The archaic system of referring to women as "Miss" if they're unmarried or "Mrs" if they're married, trivializes their existence as individuals. It gives them identity based on their marital status. Is there an equivalent of that for men? Um, no, of course not. THEY'RE the "owners" in this scenario and we're the PROPERTY.

For "traditionalists" who think these archaic terms are perfectly fine, let me ask you why? WHY should women be referred to in a manner that identifies their marital status? And if women should be identified that way...why not men, too?

Did hell freeze over?!

Did hell freeze over and someone forgot to tell me? What, you're asking? Here's the deal: It NEVER occurred to me, not even in my wildest dreams, that I would find myself agreeing with anything coming out of Rush Limbaugh's mouth...but it's happened. So, like I said, did hell freeze over?

Looking for anti-Obama merchandise? Shop our anti-Obama and/or pro-Hillary merchandise
It's come to my attention (no, I don't actually listen to Rush Limbaugh), that Limbaugh has stated a list of things regarding Barack Hussein Obama that we can't talk about. And, by "we," I mean anyone who isn't a Kool-Aid swigging Obamabot. Here's the list in its entirety; go ahead, see if you don't agree too!

Things You Can't Say About Obama

"With Obama we started out, we couldn't talk about his big ears 'cause that made him nervous. We've gone from that to this: Not only can we not mention his ears...

We can't talk about his mother.

We can't talk about his father.

We can't talk about his grandmother unless he does, brings her up as a "typical white person."

We can't talk about his wife, can't talk about his preacher, can't talk about his terrorist friends, can't talk about his voting record, can't talk about his religion.

We can't talk about appeasement.

We can't talk about color; we can't talk about lack of color.

We can't talk about race. We can't talk about bombers and mobsters who are his friends. We can't talk about schooling. We can't talk about his name, "Hussein."

We can't talk about his lack of experience. Can't talk about his income. Can't talk about his flag pin.

This started out we can't call him a liberal.

It started out we just couldn't talk about his ears.

Now we can't say anything about him."


Go, Rush! (Never thought I'd be saying that, either.)

In addition to the items Limbaugh iterated, I can think of a few others:

. We can't talk about the nauseating pro-Obama bias in the media.

. We can't talk about why his wife's thesis was taken down from her university's web site.

. We can't talk about why his wife had never been proud of America before until her husband ran for president.

. We can't talk about the New Black Panther Party endorsement that was posted on Obama's official site...and then mysteriously disappeared.

. We can't talk about Louis Farrakhan.

. We can't talk about him giving the finger to Hillary Clinton during a speech in North Carolina. (Didn't that look presidential?)

. We can't talk about how woefully unable to speak in a coherent manner he is without a TelePrompTer handy to feed him one of his "articulate, eloquent" speeches.

. We can't talk about Michelle Obama's full-length mink coat (which shows their character when it comes to not caring about animals).

. Perhaps worst of all, we can't in any way question his qualifications (actually, his lack thereof) without being accused of being racist.

Guess what? I'm HAPPY to hear that someone, anyone, even if it is Rush Limbaugh, has the fucking balls to bring out the ridiculous "rules" of this new kind of campaign. It's about time.

Racist if you're pro-Hillary...but not sexist if you're pro-Obama?

Like anyone with a functioning brain, I'm left wondering what's up with the "race card" being played by the Obama camp, whether directly or via his mouthpieces, such as the mainstream media and his cult followers/thugs. Why is it that when one supports Hillary Clinton--the vastly superior and more qualified candidate, who happens to be female and white--they're racist, but if one supports Obama--the woefully inferior and horribly unqualified candidate, who happens to be male and half black--they're not sexist?

Looking for anti-Obama merchandise? Shop our anti-Obama and/or pro-Hillary merchandise
Let me make sure I'm understanding this correctly, okay? Hillary Clinton has decades of proven experience, including working for the less fortunate, working for women's and children's rights and welfare, and working for the good of the general public. She has massive knowledge about economics, world politics, and much more. When her supporters talk about why we support her, it's easy! We can iterate any number of concrete, tangible accomplishments spanning many decades. This is why we're supporting her, not because she's white.

On the other hand, ask any Obamabot why they're supporting their cult leader, and you know what you get? Standard, pre-fab replies! For example, "He represents HOPE!", "He's all about CHANGE!", and "He's so articulate!" (Excuse me while I lose my lunch. *GAG*) What those cult members absolutely cannot do is list his accomplishments. That's because...there really aren't any.

Unless you consider taking money from slumlords like Tony Rezko--while his tenants shivered through winter without heat--an accomplishment. Or voting 'present' on tough issues instead of having the balls to vote for or against them. Or failing to vote 41% of the time during the current Congress (as opposed to 30% for Hillary Clinton). Or attending a church for two decades where hatred, intolerance, racism, anti-Semitism, and anti-Americanism are wildly applauded as they're spewed by its hatemongering preacher. Now, if THOSE things qualify as accomplishments to be proud of, and that warrant supporting someone for president, okay, that would make sense...but what kind of IDIOT would want that?

After forcing myself to look at the vile, ignorant comments at UNDemocraticUnderground lately, I was hit by how many Obamabots claim that Hillary supporters are racist. What I'd love to hear is how they've come to that conclusion. But...there's one problem with that: They're incapable of rational, individual thought. Therefore, they're unable to see/grasp that their cult leader is full of shit but not much else, and they have nothing left to do but bash us for being racist because they're too ignorant--and stupid--to understand the truth. There's nothing RACIST about choosing a superior candidate. Too bad the Obama cult, collectively, doesn't have enough functioning gray matter to understand that.

As for that "articulate" thing...you know who else was articulate? Ted Bundy. He was suave, intelligent, articulate, and very charismatic. He was also a serial killer, claiming more than 30 lives before he was executed. Then there was Jim Jones. He, too, was charismatic, articulate, and could convince people to do his bidding, even when that involved insane requests. But nearly 1,000 dead bodies don't lie. They drank the Kool-Aid...Obamabots still have time to say, "No thanks!" to theirs.

So to all the Obama cult members who insist on citing their leader's being articulate as a reason to support him for president: IT DOESN'T MEAN ANYTHING. By the way, Ted Bundy and Jim Jones (and many other notorious people) were articulate without the help of a TelePrompTer...

McGovern. Dukakis. Kerry. Obama...

It's looking more and more inevitable that the Democratic National Committee--who has been SHOVING Obama down our throats for months now--will get its way and have [the grossly unqualified] Barack Hussein Obama on the ticket against John McCain in November. And, if it does work out that way, you know what we can expect? Another in a long line of Democratic candidates who FAILED to get elected, and we'll have the DNC (and the ultra-biased [in Obama's favor] media) to blame.

Looking for anti-Obama merchandise? Shop our anti-Obama and/or pro-Hillary merchandise
If you're too young to remember, or just need/want to be reminded, let's review a little recent Democratic party history.

In 1972, our nominee was George McGovern (a man I admittedly volunteered for, although I was too young to vote)...and he lost to Richard Nixon in an OVERWHELMING landslide. (49 states went to Nixon, 1 to McGovern.) So McGovern = LOSER.

In 1988, our nominee was Michael Dukakis, who will forever be remembered for a couple of embarrassing issues, one his doing and the other at the hands of the Republicans. His own faux pas occurred when he (or someone in his camp) had the brilliant idea of putting him in a Challenger tank for a photo op. Unfortunately, this plan backfired, as he came out looking foolish instead of "commander-in-chief"-ish. That would've been bad enough, but once the Republicans took Dukakis to task in the "Willie Horton" issue, it was a lost cause. William Horton was a convicted murderer who was released from prison as a result of a prison furlough program Dukakis supported. Once out of prison, Horton committed a rape and assault, and after this came to light the Republicans grabbed it and wouldn't let go. Dukakis lost to George HW Bush. Dukakis = LOSER.

Last time around, in 2000, our nominee was John Kerry. Although I wasn't crazy about him, I dutifully supported him since ANYONE would be better than George W Bush! Well, the Republicans "swift boated" Kerry and his presidential aspirations ended, too. Kerry = LOSER.

Now what do all of these losers have in common with Obama? They've all endorsed him. Enough said!

Who's buying this shit?! Obama vs. Wright...nothing but an act

Here's a rhetorical question: Is anyone actually naive (stupid?) enough to believe that the supposed war of words between Barack Hussein Obama and his LONGTIME friend/pastor/spiritual advisor/mentor, Jeremiah Wright, is legitimate? As much as I'd like to give the masses more credit than that, when it comes to Obamabots...well, let's just say they're not the sharpest knives in the drawer. So, for their benefit, let me explain what's really happening here.


After the truth about Obama's longtime pastor/friend/spiritual advisor/"uncle"/mentor, Jeremiah Wright, came to the attention of the general public, Obama made one of his [TelePrompTer-aided] "eloquent" speeches, this time about race. His cult members, er, followers, er, supporters, lapped it up! His "articulate" explanation [full of lies, to anyone with a working brain capable of processing what they're hearing] was all they needed to gloss over Obama's TWENTY YEAR association with the despicable Wright. But wait! It turns out they're not all that stupid/blind/naive!

No indeed. A lot of people, even die-hard Obamabots, actually started asking themselves some tough questions, such as "how does a man have such a close relationship with a pastor (including having him perform their wedding ceremony and baptize their children) for such a long time, and be so close to him that they call him their uncle, yet have no clue about his seething anti-white racism, his anti-America stance, his anti-Semitic beliefs, and so on?" Once the effects of the Kool-Aid started to wear off and they really started asking themselves questions like this, thank goodness a lot of them came to their senses.

So now you have Obama getting blasted for not having left the church at any point during those two decades, for not having severed his ties with Wright after learning of his extreme racism and hatred, and for failing to admit that he was present (even though words in his own book indicate otherwise) during ANY of the plethora of venomous "sermons" given by Wright over the years. Next thing you know, people are starting to bail from the Obama bandwagon! FINALLY, it seems, they're seeing the truth about him, about his character, and--most importantly of all--some of them are actually learning that he has no qualifications to be president. Hillary Clinton starts winning primary after primary, as more and more people see the light. What to do...what to do...

Then, LIKE A MIRACLE!, Obama and Wright have a very public falling out. Obama disowns Wright, Wright insults Obama, Obama denounces Wright, Wright says Obama is just another politician...etc. Then Obama gets to give yet another [TelePrompTer-aided] "eloquent" speech, this time making it very clear that he has severed ties with Wright and that he denounces Wright's teachings/preachings/beliefs. Oh, okay, I get it! Now we can ALL believe that Obama has been exonerated! Poor little Barack...so misunderstood. It wasn't HIM who spewed those venomous anti-American and anti-white sermons, after all, it was his now-disowned former uncle! And see how NASTY that former uncle is? Just imagine, saying such wicked, horrid things about Barack! Of course Obama doesn't want anything to do with him ever again...and it's obviously terrible that he was so fooled, so...bamboozled by Wright for all those years. That's right, Obama is not the one at fault!

BULLSHIT. It's all an act, folks. It's a smokescreen devised by Obama and Wright to make Obama LOOK like the victim here instead of what he truly is, a grown man fully responsible for his own actions. And his actions speak volumes about his character...or, in his case, the lack thereof.

There's a special place in hell for women who don't help other women

After Obama's long string of blunder...after blunder...after blunder, we're happy to say that many women who had thrown Hillary under the bus in favor of the Kool-Aid king are now coming to their senses. Good thing, too, as it's SHAMEFUL for any woman--black, white, young, old--to shun Clinton in favor of the UNQUALIFIED Obama.Of course it's also shameful for any MAN to support the unqualified, unethical, anti-white, money-laundering, anti-Semitic, homophobic Obama, but it's inexcusable for women. Hillary Clinton has a long track record of not only working for the good of the people in general, but she has ALWAYS been committed to working for women's (and children's) issues--and the same simply CANNOT be said about Obama.

On a slightly different note, we've come across an incredibly informative video about Obama that anyone [especially those still crazy enough to be supporting him] can learn a lot from. Please take the time (about 13 minutes) to watch it in its entirety; I promise, you won't be sorry you did. It's currently on the front page of this web site. UPDATE: The video has moved from its original location on that site; you can see it directly on YouTube. Its title is "I Invented The Internet, Episode 1: The Audacity" (in case you ever need to search for it!).


.

Obama: Running scared! (And rightly so)

I suppose this shouldn't be surprising--after all, he's completely lost without his beloved TelePrompTer--but Obama has made clear that he will not debate Clinton prior to the next round of primaries: "I'm not ducking. We've had 21 [debates]" Obama said on Fox News Sunday. Um, yes, oBLAHma, you're ducking.

Looking for anti-Obama merchandise? Shop our anti-Obama and/or pro-Hillary merchandise
See, Obama, the TRUTH (something else--along with original thought--you wouldn't recognize even if it jumped up and bit you) is that although there have been 21 debates, the first 20 gave you a free ride! It was only the 21st debate that even BEGAN to broach the subjects you've worked so hard to steer clear of. That's the one where you whined and cried like a baby afterwards because you didn't like the "tough" treatment the moderators gave you--although I have yet to hear you complain about the MUCH TOUGHER treatment the moderators of the prior 20 debates gave your opponent. What's up with that? Poor wittle baby...waaaaah!

Here's something else for [anyone who's stupid enough to be] Obama supporters: Read this article about Obama's money laundering. Gee, he's SUCH an upstanding guy!!

Still supporting Obama?

The attached image represents the feelings of a growing number of Americans who made the mistake--and it definitely was a mistake--of voting for Barack Hussein Obama in their states' primaries, and now wish they could take their votes back. Unfortunately, that's not possible. However, it is still possible for those who haven't voted to come to their senses.
If you're still supporting Obama, please consider the following.

Are you white? If so, are you aware of the radical, anti-white agenda Obama and his church promote? It's called Black Liberation Theology; you can get details on this site or, if you're truly interested in understanding Obama's ideology, you can buy or read the book by James H Cone, A Black Theology of Liberation. For now, just consider this quote from that book: "Black theology will accept only the love of God which participates in the destruction of the white enemy. What we need is the divine love as expressed in Black Power, which is the power of black people to destroy their oppressors here and now by any means at their disposal." Is THAT what you want in a president? Is it okay with you that you're supporting a person who considers you an enemy and oppressor, and who wants you dead?!

Do you also know that The New Black Panther Party supports Obama? Are you aware of their 10 Point Platform? No? Well, here are a few excerpts:

"3. We want tax exemption and an end to robbery of THE BLACK NATION by the CAPITALIST...We believe our people should be exempt from ALL TAXATION as long as we are deprived of equal justice under the laws of the land and the overdue reparations debt remains unpaid. We will accept payment in fertile and mine rally rich land, precious metals, industry, commerce and currency...The American white man owes us reparations."

"4. We want decent housing, fit for shelter of human beings, free health-care (preventive and maintenance)...We believe since the white landlords will not give decent housing and quality health care to our Black Community, the housing, the land, the social, political and economic institutions should be made into independent UUAMAA “New African Communal/Cooperatives” so that our community, with government reparations and aid (until we can do for ourselves) can build and make drug free, decent housing with health facilities for our people."

"6. We want all Black Men and Black Women to be exempt from military service. We believe that Black People should not be forced to fight in the military service to defend a racist government that holds us captive and does not protect us...We will protect ourselves from the force and violence of the racist police and the racist military, 'by any means necessary.'"

"8. We want freedom for all Black Men and Black Women held in international, military, federal, state, county, city jails and prisons. We believe that all Black People and people of color should be released from the many jails and prisons because they have not received a fair and impartial trial. 'Released' means 'released' to the lawful authorities of the Black Nation." [EDITOR'S NOTE: Right...never mind the CRIMES committed by black people who are in prison, crimes like, oh, MURDER, RAPE, ROBBERY, KIDNAPPING...let's just let them out because not a SINGLE ONE of them received a fair and impartial trial. But, wait! What about all the WHITES in prison? Did THEY get fair, impartial trials?]

"10. WE DEMAND AN END TO THE RACIST DEATH PENALTY AS IT IS APPLIED TO BLACK AND OPPRESSED PEOPLE IN AMERICA. WE DEMAND FREEDOM FOR ALL POLITICAL PRISONERS OF THE BLACK RED AND BROWN NATION!
We want land, bread, housing, education, clothing, justice and peace. And, as our political objective, we want NATIONAL LIBERATION in a separate state or territory of our own, here or elsewhere, “a liberated zone” (“New Africa” or Africa)...History has proven that the white man is absolutely disagreeable to get along with in peace..."

Have you seen enough? If not, please go read their entire plan for yourself. How does that make you feel as a white person? THIS IS WHAT YOU'RE SUPPORTING if you support Obama! Please, wake up before it's too late.


.

Time for Howard Dean to see the light

The shameful, disgraceful behavior of Howard Dean and the DNC has reached yet another new low: They were apparently behind the cancellation of the debate that was to have taken place on April 27 between, of course, Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Hussein Obama. It looks like Dean/DNC didn't want to take a chance on a repeat of the last debate--the one where Obama made a complete, utter ass out of himself, stumbling and stuttering over "tough" questions (NOT nearly as tough as the ones Clinton gets asked EVERY day) and looking every bit the shallow, hollow, unqualified person that he is.

Looking for anti-Obama merchandise? Shop our anti-Obama and/or pro-Hillary merchandise

Well, in the past few days I've called the DNC--and made sure that my comments would get passed along to Howard Dean--and written directly to Dean. I want to make sure they're aware of what they're doing to the Democratic Party's core supporters--those of us who have been Democrats for many years or decades, and who are so disgusted with the way the DNC has tried to push oBLAHma on us that we're planning on leaving the party. This is what I wrote to Howard Dean yesterday:

I am APPALLED at your, and the DNC's, treatment of Hillary Clinton during this campaign. I am a LIFELONG Democrat who will LEAVE the party if Obama is our nominee.

I do not want a person with friends like these: http://www.jeffhead.com/obamacircle.htm as the Democratic nominee.

I do not want a person who--for TWENTY YEARS--sat in a church and listened to the hatred spewed by Jeremiah Wright [even though he claims he was miraculously absent every single time Wright spewed said hatred], and who had a close personal relationship with the hate-spewing Wright.

I do not want a nominee who has shown NOTHING of substance, and reacted by whining when ONE out of 20+ debates actually asked him a few "tough" questions.

I want a nominee with experience, integrity, and a PROVEN track record of working for the good of the general public. That person, Dr Dean, is Hillary Clinton.

If her recent primary wins--to say nothing of having captured EVERY SINGLE BIG STATE--aren't enough to convince you that she is the person the DNC should be supporting, you're going to lose me and MANY OTHER lifelong Democrats. I am prepared to shift my support from Clinton to McCain in the event that Obama is our party's nominee.

I am also prepared to--and WILL--leave the Democratic party and register as an Independent or, gasp, as a Republican.

You're ALIENATING the core members of this party and I find that disgraceful and inexcusable. Why are you shoving down our throats a candidate with such questionable friends, business dealings, and lack of experience?

Please come to your senses before it's too late!

While you're at it, kindly reschedule the debate that was supposed to happen next...I guess you and other Obama supporters were afraid that he'd make yet another embarrassing appearance, stumbling over himself to answer non-fluff questions. Guess what? The voters WANT to see what the two candidates are really all about!

Finally, unless you seat the Florida and Michigan delegates, you're alienating and disenfranchising 2.3 million people who went out and voted and who, through no fault of their own, now face having their votes go uncounted. Guess what? Many of them are prepared to leave the party, too.

If you haven't already, please contact Howard Dean and ask him to reschedule the debate--tell him you want to hear what Obama has to say when asked non-fluff questions. And, assuming that you're not under the influence of the Obama Kool-Aid, tell him you're disgusted with the DNC's support of the racist, sexist, homophobic, anti-Semitic, anti-American Obama and that you don't appreciate having such a despicable character shoved down your throat by the DNC.

Barack Hussein Obama: Not now, not ever!

Well, well, well... So Obama outspends Hillary 4 to 1 in Pennsylvania, and what does he get? A BIG FUCKING LOSS. And I'm loving it. Has the Kool-Aid finally lost its potency?

Looking for anti-Obama merchandise? Shop our anti-Obama and/or pro-Hillary merchandise
It looks like Pennsylvanians went out and voted with their conscience, instead of relying on the Obama Kool-Aid/bandwagon/hope and change rhetoric/media bias. That's wonderful, but it begs the question: WHAT TOOK SO FUCKING LONG?! If Obama's Kool-Aid swigging cult members had been capable of looking at him for what he actually is, i.e., a despicable, hate-filled, racist man who also happens to be wholly unqualified for the office of president, Clinton would have won the nomination months ago. If Obama's cult members had taken a good hard look at the scum he has surrounded himself with--over many, many years--perhaps the lightbulb would have gone off a lot sooner. If the media, instead of deifying Obama, had treated him the same as they were treating Clinton, his followers would have had no choice but to see the light long ago.

The man is hollow. There's nothing there. Anyone who has actually LISTENED to him during the debates--even the first 20+ debates in which he was given a free ride, let alone the most recent one where he was actually asked a few "tough" questions--would have no choice but to see that he's clueless.

So how do we explain the unprecedented, unwarranted adulation Obama has received during this campaign? I don't know! Mass spiking of Kool-Aid with something that turns seemingly normal people's brains into misfiring blobs of gray cells?

The audacity of truth, or, Obama's circle of friends

It's certainly no secret that we cannot stand Barack Obama, so this should come as no surprise! We came across an interesting web site yesterday--a web site from a very unlikely source (as in, not exactly a liberal Democrat!--that does a good job of quantifying Obama's circle of friends in words and pictures.

Looking for anti-Obama merchandise? Shop our anti-Obama and/or pro-Hillary merchandise
For example, this page, THE AUDACITY OF TRUTH - OBAMA'S CIRCLE OF FRIENDS AND SUPPORT, outlines some of Obama's closest friends and mentors--people like William Ayers (Weatherman Underground bomber, unrepentant domestic terrorist), Jeremiah Wright (Black Liberation militant, racist, pastor, friend, mentor/spiritual adviser to Obama for 20 years), etc.

Then there's this page, THE AUDACITY OF TRUTH - BLACK LIBERATION THEOLOGY AND OBAMA'S CHURCH, which explains a bit about Obama's church and its belief in Black Liberation Theology. What does that mean, you're asking? Here's a quote from the page:

"Black theology refuses to accept a God who is not identified totally with the goals of the black community. If God is not for us and against white people, then he is a murderer, and we had better kill him. The task of black theology is to kill Gods who do not belong to the black community ... Black theology will accept only the love of God which participates in the destruction of the white enemy. What we need is the divine love as expressed in Black Power, which is the power of black people to destroy their oppressors here and now by any means at their disposal. Unless God is participating in this holy activity, we must reject his love."

Sounds lovely...doesn't it? Especially for those of us who are white.

Finally, there's this page, THE AUDACITY OF TRUTH - BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, which includes pictures of Obama's campaign headquarters proudly displaying pictures of Che Guevara, and asks this rhetorical question: "What change does Obama intend. What is his hope?"

So we're left wondering, are Obama's cult members aware of the company he keeps? Do they understand the ideology he subscribes to? If the answer is yes...how on earth can they support him? And if the answer is no...why are they supporting someone they know so little about?

Uh...um...aaaannnnddd... (or how Obama performed in last night's debate)

It was ABOUT TIME that a debate actually contained a few non-fluff questions for Obama. Goodness, did he ever look shocked! I guess his campaign was unable to pay off ABC. It was great seeing him stumble with his typical "uh...um...aaaaaaand....uh...." responses when he doesn't have a TelePrompTer handy to feed him one of his "eloquent, articulate" speeches. What a laugh that guy is...

My only confusion is this: Since Obama is unequivocally unqualified to be president--AND has a looooong record of associating with horrible people--is HE the stupid one, or does that title go to his cult members...er, followers...er, supporters?

Looking for anti-Obama merchandise? Shop our anti-Obama and/or pro-Hillary merchandise
As usual, Clinton was poised, articulate, gave intelligent answers, and was unruffled by touchy questions, such as her brain fart on the Bosnia issue (which has been documented elsewhere, correctly, for all to see, so it's not like she was trying to pull a fast one).

Clinton is so VASTLY SUPERIOR to Obama in every possible way, it's shocking to think of how many people have fallen for his empty rhetoric. One thing I was glad to see last night? I can't recall a single instance of Obama saying his usual line when asked a "hard" question: "I agree with Senator Clinton!" I suppose that's because Clinton's not the one who had a 20-year CLOSE (as in mentor, adviser, pastor, friend) relationship with a bigoted, hate-filled, anti-American, anti-gay, anti-Semitic, misogynist, so she wasn't asked about stuff like that. Unfortunately for Obama, that left him unable to spew his usual response! Normally, Clinton gets asked the tough questions first, answers them intelligently and thoughtfully, and then it's Obama's turn, at which point he says, "uh...um...I...uh...I AGREE WITH SENATOR CLINTON!" What a farce.

And just how ironic/funny is it that Obama's cult members are whining and moaning about how "unfair" the debate was last night, when Clinton has been CRUCIFIED for the past year-plus while oBLAHma has (had?) been given a free ride in the media. So what happens when two debate moderators FINALLY have the balls to ask Obama a few tough questions? His followers cry and whine like the ignorant, uninformed, Kool-Aid drinking cult members they are. It's fine with them when Hillary Clinton gets scrutinized for every imaginable thing, and is constantly, consistently asked HARD questions, but when the tables are turned...oh, they're not the least bit happy. What a sorry bunch of losers.

Instead of whining about their cult leader's imaginary unfair treatment in the debate, why aren't they asking themselves WHY they're supporting this idiot? Let's see:

. if you're white, you should be APPALLED at his tacit approval of Jeremiah Wright's anti-white racism
. if you're Jewish, you should be APPALLED at his association with anti-Semites such as Farrakhan and, therefore, his tacit approval of/agreement with those anti-Semitic beliefs
. if you're gay, you should be APPALLED at his anti-gay beliefs
. if you're working-class, you should be INSULTED by his elitist disregard for your financial well being
. if you're female, you should be INSULTED and APPALLED by his misogynistic attitude
. if you're male, you should be EMBARRASSED by the way he represents your gender
. if you're concerned for animals, you should be APPALLED at his and his wife's disregard for the torture fur animals are subjected to
. if you're an American, you should be suspect of someone whose 20-year-long relationship with the anti-America Jeremiah Wright makes quite clear that he, too, is anti-American

and so on.

In other, words, if you're HUMAN--and not anti-America, anti-white, anti-Semitic, anti-gay, anti-female, pro-animal cruelty, and/or an elitist snob--you should not be supporting this poseur. And shame on those who do...

By the way, there's a special place in hell for women who don't help other women. DOUBLE SHAME to any woman supporting this piece of...well, let's just say this very inexperienced, very hate-filled, very elitist (and, of course, a plagiarist) hollow man. Too bad you're too blinded by all the [unwarranted, undeserved] hype to see the truth, even though it's staring you right in the face. Too bad you won't see the light until, perhaps, it's too late (if oBLAHma wins the general election). And it's especially too bad--and really painful to watch--that you're throwing the FAR MORE QUALIFIED candidate, who happens to be a woman, under the bus in order to support...WHAT? Empty promises of "change" and "hope"?

Obama's true colors are shining through!

With all the recent revelations about Obama's true character being made public, it's hard to know where to start!

For one thing, it may be okay with Obama that his mentor/friend/preacher/adviser Jeremiah Wright wishes to "damn America!", but it's not okay with me. Luckily, a LOT of other Americans feel the same way, and it's showing in the hits our main site is getting and in the merchandise we're selling. It seems like the public now can't get enough of anti-Obama merchandise and pro-Hillary Clinton merchandise.

It's particularly gratifying to see REFORMED Obama-ites realizing the error of their ways and joining forces with the rest of us Hillary Clinton supporters. Although they appeared to be brain-dead and/or brainwashed when they were under the cult leader's spell, we're now finding that they do in fact have the ability to think for themselves. I guess it just takes breaking away from the cult for them to regain their sensibilities.

Looking for anti-Obama merchandise? Shop our anti-Obama and/or pro-Hillary merchandise
Of course, there are still a lot of Obamabots who haven't seen the light...and that's definitely a mystery. What does it take to get these folks to see that Obama is a racist AND anti-American? You can try to justify his remaining a member of Wright's church--and a close friend of Wright--for twenty years, but what reasonable person can actually swallow any of those rationalizations? I mean, how do you explain away TWO DECADES attending a church where hatred and intolerance spew from its preacher's mouth?! No one in their right mind can truly believe that Obama was--miraculously!--absent EACH and EVERY time Wright spewed his hatred...can they?

For those who insist that it doesn't matter if Wright is anti-America and racist, because that doesn't mean Obama is, sorry, but you're wrong. When a person CHOOSES to continue associating with an angry, hate-filled man like Jeremiah Wright, AND selects this man to baptize his children, act as his personal spiritual adviser, etc., it DOES matter. It matters because there is no way that Obama could have been in the dark about Wright's beliefs. It matters because--at ANY TIME during those 20 years--Obama could have stood up for his beliefs [if they were different from Wright's!], decried the hatred and intolerance Wright espoused, and quit attending that church. But he didn't. And that speaks volumes about his character--and his beliefs.

We find it laughable that even now, die-hard Obama-ites, such as Bill Richardson, are using the line they've been programmed to recite: Obama is "a once-in-a-lifetime leader...Above all, you will be a president who brings this nation together." (Excuse me while I gag.) Is he fucking serious?! Yeah, right, this man who has spent twenty YEARS agreeing with anti-white and anti-American sentiments is going to unite us. Oh...my...goodness. Is anyone REALLY that stupid?!

What lie will Obama tell next?

I mentioned yesterday that rumor had it there was proof Barack Obama had been present at Jeremiah Wright's hate-filled "sermons"--despite his protests denying his presence--and today we have it! Here you go--and I NEVER thought I'd be citing Newsmax.com for anything, but they're all I've got right now--although I'm sure that will change. With this latest disgusting, disgraceful revelation about Obama, surely the ultra-pro-Obama-biased mainstream media will HAVE to talk about it...right? Here's the article in its entirety, and I strongly suggest that you read it, all of it. It's too long and too detailed to break down into little snippets here, so please take the time to read the whole thing.

Shop our anti-Obama or pro-Hillary merchandise
I can only hope that the Kool-Aid swigging Obama-ites who have blindly followed this man of "hope" and "change" will now see what they're ACTUALLY supporting--a man who has aligned himself for TWENTY YEARS with a hate-mongering, anti-America, anti-white, anti-gay, anti-female "uncle." This "uncle" has had such an important role in Obama's life that he got the inspiration for his book's title from him. (Has Obama EVER had an original thought?!)

Now that the truth has come out and Obama was, in fact, present while Wright preached his hatred, we're left to wonder: What lie will Obama tell next? How is he going to lie...or bluff...or "I agree with Senator Clinton!" his way out of this...

If Hillary Clinton had been attending KKK meetings religiously for the past 20 years, including building a CLOSE personal relationship with the grand poobah (or whatever they're called), relying on him as an "uncle" and a spiritual adviser, you'd better BELIEVE that once that became public knowledge she would be forced to drop out of the campaign.

Why is there a double standard when a black man attends a racist church? Is racism okay as long as it's coming FROM blacks AGAINST whites? Would anyone believe Hillary if, in the hypothetical scenario I mentioned above, she now claimed to be unaware of the hatred her "uncle" had been preaching for 20 years? Would the public let that get swept under the rug? I DON'T THINK SO!

Obama needs to drop out of the race now; only then can we HOPE that this sad part of American history will fade into the shadows along with the unqualified man who was given hero worship he didn't deserve. Obama can go off with his pals Louis Farrakhan--the Jew hater, Tony Rezko--the crook, Al Sharpton--the divisive "reverend," Jeremiah Wright--the racist, white-hating, America-hating, gay-hating, woman-hating "uncle," and any other lowlifes he calls friends/advisers. With any luck, we'll never have to hear about oBLAHma again. That's what I call REAL change.

Obama's a busy man!

Yes, indeed, Obama is certainly a busy man these days--between denouncing his hate-mongering "spiritual adviser" of 20 years, Jeremiah Wright, denouncing Louis Farrakhan and his anti-Jewish beliefs, and decrying his boneheaded decisions regarding Tony Rezko...the list just goes on and on. *sigh*

Shop our anti-Obama or pro-Hillary merchandise
With Wright, Obama--who has clearly been pegged as a liar by a lot of us Clinton supporters--has stated unequivocally that he was never present when Wright preached his racist, sexist hatred to his church. (Funny, huh, that one of the few times Obama [claims he] wasn't "present" it happens to be when there's a scandal breaking in his church...unlike all those "present" votes he's cast?) But wait! We're hearing talk about Newsmax.com having video showing Obama IN CHURCH as Wright was spewing one of his despicable "sermons." I hear that Newsmax is waiting until Monday (day after tomorrow) to air it, although I don't know why they would wait.

Did you know that Obama's spiritual adviser has said that blacks should condemn the United States? Not only that, but he said, "The government gives them the drugs, builds bigger prisons, passes a three-strike law and then wants us to sing 'God Bless America.' No, no, no, God damn America, that's in the Bible for killing innocent people. God damn America for treating our citizens as less than human. God damn America for as long as she acts like she is God and she is supreme." Nice guy, eh? And doesn't it just make you feel all warm and fuzzy knowing that Obama has looked up to this wonderful, loving man all these years?

My fellow Clinton supporters and I are wondering if this LATEST insight into their leader will FINALLY cause Obama cult members to see the light. But I don't know...they're awfully brainwashed. I think they're too far into denial to be able to recognize him for what he is: A lying, low-life who has friends like Farrakhan, Rezko, and Wright. All the "denouncing" in the world can't undo the fact that these really ARE his friends, advisers, and business partners.

If--as Obama likes to claim, loudly and often--he has such GREAT judgment, how is it that this ONE MAN has surrounded himself by so many shady, hateful, crooked, and nasty characters? Can anyone say Richard Nixon? Am I the only one reminded of that crook and his crooked friends?!

What will it take for the cult to see they've been hoodwinked? The only CHANGE they can HOPE for is that Obama does the right thing--for once--and drops out of the race. If he has an ounce of dignity, this is what he must do.

By the way, if Hillary Clinton had been shown to be a member of a church that preaches anti-America and anti-white hatred, you'd better BELIEVE the masses would be calling for her head. There is no way she'd be able to sweep this under the rug. The media, the Republicans, and Obama's cult would all want her to resign as a senator and from the presidential race. Will those same people react the same way towards Obama? I hope so.

Finally, Geraldine Ferraro was right, you know...even if it is painful to admit. I don't really understand how it happened, but it's clear that the Obama cult has fallen for him--even subconsciously--as a way of making up for America's past bad deeds, specifically its history of [black] slavery. The thing is, they've lost sight of the single most important thing when supporting a presidential candidate: He--or SHE--needs to be the most qualified person for the job. No one in their right mind can claim Obama fits that bill.

O-blah-blah-blah-ma, or how Obama speaks a lot...but doesn't really SAY anything

Sure, we've ALL heard about how articulate Obama is and what an eloquent speaker he is, and how his speeches are so inspiring...blah blah blah. But what is it exactly that he's saying? Beats me!


Looking for anti-Obama merchandise? Shop our anti-Obama and/or pro-Hillary merchandise
For example, he and his campaign are attempting to use Hillary Clinton's supposed vote "for the Iraq war" as something against her...blah blah blah. But what did Clinton actually say when she cast that vote? Here you go; these are snippets of her speech on the Senate floor October 10, 2002; bolding is my doing for emphasis; to read the entire speech, please visit the official copy:

October 10, 2002

Floor Speech of Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton
on S.J. Res. 45, A Resolution to Authorize the Use of
United States Armed Forces Against Iraq

"Today we are asked whether to give the President of the United States authority to use force in Iraq should diplomatic efforts fail to dismantle Saddam Hussein's chemical and biological weapons and his nuclear program."

"Now, I believe the facts that have brought us to this fateful vote are not in doubt. Saddam Hussein is a tyrant who has tortured and killed his own people, even his own family members, to maintain his iron grip on power. He used chemical weapons on Iraqi Kurds and on Iranians, killing over 20 thousand people. Unfortunately, during the 1980's, while he engaged in such horrific activity, he enjoyed the support of the American government, because he had oil and was seen as a counterweight to the Ayatollah Khomeini in Iran."

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members, though there is apparently no evidence of his involvement in the terrible events of September 11, 2001."

"It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons. Should he succeed in that endeavor, he could alter the political and security landscape of the Middle East, which as we know all too well affects American security."

"If we were to attack Iraq now, alone or with few allies, it would set a precedent that could come back to haunt us. In recent days, Russia has talked of an invasion of Georgia to attack Chechen rebels. India has mentioned the possibility of a pre-emptive strike on Pakistan. And what if China were to perceive a threat from Taiwan?

So Mr. President, for all its appeal, a unilateral attack, while it cannot be ruled out, on the present facts is not a good option."

"So, Mr. President, the question is how do we do our best to both defuse the real threat that Saddam Hussein poses to his people, to the region, including Israel, to the United States, to the world, and at the same time, work to maximize our international support and strengthen the United Nations?"

"While there is no perfect approach to this thorny dilemma, and while people of good faith and high intelligence can reach diametrically opposed conclusions, I believe the best course is to go to the UN for a strong resolution that scraps the 1998 restrictions on inspections and calls for complete, unlimited inspections with cooperation expected and demanded from Iraq. I know that the Administration wants more, including an explicit authorization to use force, but we may not be able to secure that now, perhaps even later. But if we get a clear requirement for unfettered inspections, I believe the authority to use force to enforce that mandate is inherent in the original 1991 UN resolution, as President Clinton recognized when he launched Operation Desert Fox in 1998.

If we get the resolution that President Bush seeks, and if Saddam complies, disarmament can proceed and the threat can be eliminated. Regime change will, of course, take longer but we must still work for it, nurturing all reasonable forces of opposition.

If we get the resolution and Saddam does not comply, then we can attack him with far more support and legitimacy than we would have otherwise."

"I believe international support and legitimacy are crucial. After shots are fired and bombs are dropped, not all consequences are predictable. While the military outcome is not in doubt, should we put troops on the ground, there is still the matter of Saddam Hussein's biological and chemical weapons. Today he has maximum incentive not to use them or give them away. If he did either, the world would demand his immediate removal. Once the battle is joined, however, with the outcome certain, he will have maximum incentive to use weapons of mass destruction and to give what he can't use to terrorists who can torment us with them long after he is gone. We cannot be paralyzed by this possibility, but we would be foolish to ignore it. And according to recent reports, the CIA agrees with this analysis. A world united in sharing the risk at least would make this occurrence less likely and more bearable and would be far more likely to share with us the considerable burden of rebuilding a secure and peaceful post-Saddam Iraq."

"President Bush's speech in Cincinnati and the changes in policy that have come forth since the Administration began broaching this issue some weeks ago have made my vote easier. Even though the resolution before the Senate is not as strong as I would like in requiring the diplomatic route first and placing highest priority on a simple, clear requirement for unlimited inspections, I will take the President at his word that he will try hard to pass a UN resolution and will seek to avoid war, if at all possible.

"This is a very difficult vote. This is probably the hardest decision I have ever had to make -- any vote that may lead to war should be hard -- but I cast it with conviction."

"And perhaps my decision is influenced by my eight years of experience on the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue in the White House watching my husband deal with serious challenges to our nation. I want this President, or any future President, to be in the strongest possible position to lead our country in the United Nations or in war. Secondly, I want to insure that Saddam Hussein makes no mistake about our national unity and for our support for the President's efforts to wage America's war against terrorists and weapons of mass destruction. And thirdly, I want the men and women in our Armed Forces to know that if they should be called upon to act against Iraq, our country will stand resolutely behind them."

"My vote is not, however, a vote for any new doctrine of pre-emption, or for uni-lateralism, or for the arrogance of American power or purpose -- all of which carry grave dangers for our nation, for the rule of international law and for the peace and security of people throughout the world."

"War can yet be avoided, but our responsibility to global security and to the integrity of United Nations resolutions protecting it cannot. I urge the President to spare no effort to secure a clear, unambiguous demand by the United Nations for unlimited inspections."

"And finally, on another personal note, I come to this decision from the perspective of a Senator from New York who has seen all too closely the consequences of last year's terrible attacks on our nation. In balancing the risks of action versus inaction, I think New Yorkers who have gone through the fires of hell may be more attuned to the risk of not acting. I know that I am."

"So it is with conviction that I support this resolution as being in the best interests of our nation. A vote for it is not a vote to rush to war; it is a vote that puts awesome responsibility in the hands of our President and we say to him - use these powers wisely and as a last resort. And it is a vote that says clearly to Saddam Hussein - this is your last chance - disarm or be disarmed."

Looking for anti-Obama or pro-Hillary merchandise?
Well, there you have it. The ACTUAL words spoken by Hillary Clinton when she cast her vote to support the use of US Armed Forces in Iraq. The next time a Kool-Aid swigging Obama-ite tries to brainwash you into believing that Clinton blindly jumped into voting for this resolution, do THEM a favor and send them here to read the above snippets or, better still, to the full copy. Assuming they're still capable of free thought (and when you realize just how programmed and brainwashed the Obama-ites have become...they may not be) and have any living brain cells, they SHOULD be able to grasp that Clinton's decision was one fraught with concerns on her part, and made only after stressing that she wanted war to be the LAST possible resort.

Howard Dean and the DNC, I hope you're listening

As should be pretty clear by now, I cannot stand Oblahma and cannot fathom how so many [clueless] people could have fallen for his hype. Sooooo...instead of repeating myself [like Obama does endlessly] I'll make this brief!

Looking for anti-Obama or pro-Hillary merchandise?
There is NO WAY that I will vote for this unqualified, media-hyped phony baloney. And you know what? There are LOTS of other Democrats who feel the same way. Some of them are planning on casting "protest votes" (i.e., voting for someone, such as Ralph Nader, or writing in Hillary Clinton, knowing full well that their vote is basically a throw-away), others are planning not to vote at all, and still others--like myself--are planning on voting for McCain. What we all have in common is an absolute refusal to vote for Obama.

Howard Dean and the DNC (Democrat National Committee) need to realize that we're serious about this, and if it costs us [Democrats] the election in November, so be it. ANYTHING would be a better outcome than having Obaminable in the White House. My suggestion to the DNC is that they figure out some way--soon--to make the votes from the Florida and Michigan primaries count, so as not to disenfranchise those states' voters, and that they give due weight to the fact that ALL of the major states (California, New York, New Jersey, Ohio, Texas, etc.) have voted for Clinton in their primaries.

If you'd like to add your voice to those of us who will not, under any circumstances, vote for Obama should he become the Democratic nominee, please head on over to this petition and sign it today. Encourage everyone you know to do the same. Perhaps, with enough input from the public, Dean and the DNC will wake up...before it's too late.